Reinsurance

Pioneer Insurance vs. Court of Appeals [July 28, 1989]

In this case, Pioneer Insurance paid a bond for Jacob Lim’s aircraft purchase and sought reimbursement from Lim and his co-indemnitors. However, since Pioneer had already recovered the amount from its reinsurer, the Supreme Court ruled that only the reinsurer could claim subrogation rights, dismissing Pioneer’s case.

Pioneer Insurance vs. Court of Appeals [July 28, 1989] Read More »

Philamlife vs. Auditor [January 18, 1968]

In Philamlife vs. Auditor, the Supreme Court ruled that reinsurance treaties are contracts for insurance, not of insurance. Therefore, obligations to remit premiums become fixed only upon executing specific reinsurance cessions. Consequently, Philamlife’s remittances were subject to the Margin Law’s fees, as the treaty lacked a binding obligation for premium payments.

Philamlife vs. Auditor [January 18, 1968] Read More »

Scroll to Top