Article 1484

PCI Leasing vs. Giraffe-X-Creative [July 12, 2007]

In PCI Leasing vs. Giraffe-X Creative, the Supreme Court of the Philippines determined that a finance lease, despite lacking an explicit purchase option, was effectively a sale with an option to buy. Consequently, under the Recto Law, the lessor cannot both repossess the property and demand payment of unpaid installments.

PCI Leasing vs. Giraffe-X-Creative [July 12, 2007] Read More »

Cruz vs. Filipinas Investment and Finance Corporation [May 27, 1968]

In Cruz v. Filipinas Investment & Finance Corporation, the Supreme Court ruled that under Article 1484 of the Civil Code, if a seller forecloses on a chattel mortgage for a buyer’s default, they cannot pursue additional remedies, such as foreclosing on a real estate mortgage provided as extra security.

Cruz vs. Filipinas Investment and Finance Corporation [May 27, 1968] Read More »

Scroll to Top