Republic vs. Sunlife Assurance Company of Canada [October 14, 2005]

G.R. No. 158085 – REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Represented by the COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, petitioner, vs. SUNLIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, respondent.

PANGANIBAN, J.

Mutual life insurance companies that are bona fide cooperatives are entitled to exemption from the payment of taxes on life insurance premiums and documentary stamps.

Sun Life is a mutual life insurance company organized under the laws of Canada. It is registered and authorized by the SEC and the Insurance Commission to engage in the business in the Philippines as a mutual life insurance company. It made payments to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR) P31.49M and P30M as premium tax and DST, respectively.

However, Sunlife subsequently filed an administrative claim for tax credits with the CIR on ground of alleged erroneous payment. This is on the strength of the ruling of the SC in the case of CIR v. Insular Life holding that mutual life insurance companies are purely cooperative companies and are exempt from the payment of premium tax and DST.

The CIR, among others, raised the following defenses: 1) failure of Sunlife to register with the Cooperative Development Authority (CDA), 2) failure to prove that its ownership was vested to its member; 3) claimed that mutual life insurance companies earn profits on account of it being subjected to regular corporated income tax under the 1997 Tax Code.

The CIR failed to act of the claim. The CTA ruled in favor of Sunlife. The CA upheld CTA’s ruling. The SC affirmed.

  1. Is Sunlife a Cooperative?
  2. Is Sunlife’s registration with the CDA a sine qua non requirement to be entitled to tax exemption?
  3. Is Sunlife exempted from payment of tax on life insurance premiums and documentary stamp tax?
  1. Yes. Sunlife is a Cooperative.

    The Tax Code defines a Cooperative as an association “conducted by the members thereof with the money collected from among themselves and solely for their own protection and not for profit. The SC held that Sulife squarely falls within this definition.

    First, it is managed by its members.

    Sunlife has been mutualized or converted from a stock life insurance company to a non-stock mutual life insurance corporation, in conformance with existing laws. Under its bylaws, ownership has been vested in its member-policyholders who are entitled to vote. They also elect the board of trustees, the governing body of a non-stock corporation.

    Second, it is operated with money collected from its members.

    Sunlife is composed entirely of members, all premiums obviously came from them. The member-policyholders were both the “insurers” and the “insured” who contribute via premiums to create a fund for the payment of the said members’ indemnity and benefit claims.

    Third, it is licensed for the mutual protection of its members, not for the profit of anyone.

Petition denied, assailed decision and resolution affirmed.

Scroll to Top